Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV)bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV)
VS
FerrariFerrari
bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV)

bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV)

Bouw 18, Buggenhout, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9255, BE

Last Update: 21/11/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bilsteingroup.com
745/1000Moderate

Oplossingen „Made in Germany“ – wereldwijd thuis febi bilstein is wereldwijd een van de toonaangevende fabrikanten en leveranciers van onderdelen voor personen- en bedrijfswagens op de independent aftermarket. Al meer dan 160 jaar staat ons merk voor continuïteit, kwal...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ferrari

Ferrari

Abetone inferiore, Maranello, 41053, IT

Last Update: 26/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ferrari.com
748/1000Moderate

Ferrari's story officially began in 1947 when its first road car, the 125 S, emerged from the gate of no. 4 Via Abetone Inferiore in Maranello. The iconic two-seater went on to win the Rome Grand Prix later that year and shortly thereafter was developed into a refined G...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:13,311
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV)

bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ferrari

Ferrari

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrari in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ferrari (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrari cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV)

bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ferrari

Ferrari

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FER41121023
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FER1940251122
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FER41012522

FAQ

Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) company and Ferrari company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) and Ferrari, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) and Ferrari, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) or Ferrari ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) or Ferrari ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) and Ferrari, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between bilstein group FBE (febi Benelux NV) and Ferrari, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86098
SUMMARY

ntop nDPI versions before 6.0 contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the ndpi_json_string_escape function that writes beyond caller-supplied buffer boundaries. Attackers can trigger the overflow by supplying crafted network packet data including TLS SNI, HTTP headers, or DNS names that reach the vulnerable function, causing heap corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-86097
SUMMARY

PX4 Autopilot through 1.17.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in param_set_default_file() and param_set_backup_file() functions that allows attackers to crash the autopilot process. Attackers can invoke 'param select' or 'param select-backup' commands with no path argument from any PX4 shell to trigger the crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86096
SUMMARY

PX4 Autopilot through 1.17.0 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in TemperatureCalibration::start() due to a race condition between task spawning and object deletion. Attackers can trigger the calibration process via shell commands to write to freed heap memory, corrupting unrelated objects or allocator metadata and destabilizing heap operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86095
SUMMARY

Unidata netcdf-c through 4.10.1 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in NC4_HDF5_inq_attname() that copies HDF5 attribute names into a fixed 256-byte buffer without length validation. Attackers can craft HDF5 files with oversized attribute names to overflow the destination buffer, causing memory corruption and crashes when applications enumerate attribute names.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-48019
SUMMARY

Laravel is a web application framework. Prior to versions 12.60.0 and 13.10.0, a CRLF injection vulnerability in Laravel's email validation, in combination with how Symfony Mailer and Symfony Mime handle certain character sequences, may allow an unauthenticated attacker to interfere with outbound email processing in applications that send mail to user-supplied addresses. This issue has been patched in versions 12.60.0 and 13.10.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2