Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FCM Travel UKFCM Travel UK
VS
Costa Crociere S.p.A.Costa Crociere S.p.A.
FCM Travel UK

FCM Travel UK

120 The Broadway, Wimbledon, London, GB, SW19 1RH

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fcmtravel.co.uk/
761/1000Fair

Welcome to FCM, the alternative corporate travel company. What makes us the alternative? We make business travel a pleasure. Don’t just ‘get there’. Connect globally. Think differently. Travel better. Give yourself the flexibility to do corporate travel on your own ter...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:389
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Piazza Piccapietra 48, Genova, IT, 16121

Last Update: 09/10/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

Costa belongs to the Carnival Corporation Group, listed on the London and New York stock exchanges, the largest cruise company in the world. Costa, the only Italian cruise company flying the Italian flag, has been sailing the world’s seas for more than 75 years, offer...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:11,711
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FCM Travel UK

FCM Travel UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Costa Crociere S.p.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FCM Travel UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Costa Crociere S.p.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FCM Travel UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FCM Travel UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Costa Crociere S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Costa Crociere S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FCM Travel UK

FCM Travel UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FCM Travel UK company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FCM Travel UK and Costa Crociere S.p.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FCM Travel UK and Costa Crociere S.p.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FCM Travel UK or Costa Crociere S.p.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FCM Travel UK or Costa Crociere S.p.A. ?
Between FCM Travel UK and Costa Crociere S.p.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FCM Travel UK and Costa Crociere S.p.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3