Comparison Overview
FCM Travel

FCM Travel
322 High Holborn, London, England, WC1V 7PB, AU
Last Update: 19/02/2026
Welcome to FCM, the alternative corporate travel company. What makes us the alternative? We make business travel a pleasure. Don’t just ‘get there’. Connect globally. Think differently. Travel better. Give yourself the flexibility to do corporate travel on your own ter...

Princess Cruises
1510 SE 17th St, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US, 33316
Last Update: 19/09/2026
Princess is the world’s leading premium cruise line operating a fleet of modern ships visiting over 380 destinations around the globe on more than 160 itineraries. Each moment on Princess is one of wonderful discovery where guests can relax and explore. The choices are ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

FCM Travel







Princess Cruises






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for FCM Travel in 2026.
Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)
Princess Cruises has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - FCM Travel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FCM Travel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Princess Cruises (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Princess Cruises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

FCM Travel

Princess Cruises
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.