Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FCM Travel AustraliaFCM Travel Australia
VS
Europcar Mobility GroupEuropcar Mobility Group
FCM Travel Australia

FCM Travel Australia

275 Grey St, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, AU

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
760/1000Fair

Welcome to FCM, the alternative corporate travel company. What makes us the alternative? We make business travel a pleasure. Don’t just ‘get there’. Connect globally. Think differently. Travel better. Give yourself the flexibility to do corporate travel on your own ter...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:263
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

13 ter Boulevard Berthier, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75017

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
714/1000Moderate

Europcar Mobility Group is a global mobility player, with 75 years of mobility services expertise and a leading position in Europe. “We help to change the way you move” is what we stand for and brings us together. More than ever, we're committed to delivering simple, s...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:10,562
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FCM Travel Australia

FCM Travel Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FCM Travel Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Europcar Mobility Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FCM Travel Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FCM Travel Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Europcar Mobility Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Europcar Mobility Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FCM Travel Australia

FCM Travel Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EUR531040425

FAQ

Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FCM Travel Australia company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FCM Travel Australia and Europcar Mobility Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FCM Travel Australia and Europcar Mobility Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FCM Travel Australia or Europcar Mobility Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FCM Travel Australia or Europcar Mobility Group ?
Between FCM Travel Australia and Europcar Mobility Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FCM Travel Australia and Europcar Mobility Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2