Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Fat Toni's Pizzeria » FAT1768408820

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FAT1768408820)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-21
Company Score Before Incident813 / 1000
Company Score After Incident792 / 1000
Company LinkView Fat Toni's Pizzeria Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERFAT1768408820
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE10/01/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Fat Toni's Pizzeria's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Fat Toni's Pizzeria Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Fat Toni's Pizzeria breach identified under incident ID FAT1768408820.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Fat Toni's Pizzeria's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fattoni'spizzeria, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Food and Beverage Services and the number of employees: 13 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 813 and after the incident was 792 with a difference of -21 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Fat Toni's Pizzeria and their customers.

On 23 October 2023, Fat Toni's disclosed Cyber Attack issues under the banner "Cyber Attack on Fat Toni's Website".

Fat Toni's, a popular eatery in Stroud town centre, experienced a cyber-attack on its website.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Website.

In response, and began remediation that includes Restoring the website, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement via media.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Mobile app remains unaffected; website expected to be restored by Thursday.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating incident targeted the restaurant’s website, which remains offline and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating website remains offline as recovery efforts continue. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating website remains offline, affecting online orders and customer access and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details about the nature of the attack or potential data exposure. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no further details about the nature of the attack were disclosed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (80%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Disabling Security Tools (30%)

Sources & References