Comparison Overview

Fastenal

VS

Porsche Holding

Fastenal

2001 Theurer Blvd, Winona, MN, 55987, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

By providing three things – truly local service, the world’s largest vending program, and unmatched inventory management – Fastenal saves your business time and money. Who are Fastenal's customers? • Organizations wanting to strengthen their supply chains. • Businesses looking to streamline their operations. • Campuses planning for tomorrow. In a world of disruptions, Fastenal is a supply chain partner you can count on.

NAICS: 42
NAICS Definition: Wholesale Trade
Employees: 17,368
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Porsche Holding

Louise-Piëch-Straße 2, None, Salzburg, Salzburg, AT, None
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Porsche Holding Salzburg is the largest and most successful automotive distributor in Europe. Our roots are in Salzburg, but we now also operate in 29 countries on three continents. Our core expertise: global automotive distribution. Our business divisions: automotive wholesale, automotive retail, financial services and IT systems. From a humble family business to one of the largest sales organizations in the world. Driven by our passion for the automobile since the company formation in 1947, Porsche Holding has grown from a family business into the leading mobility partner with dealerships and offices in 23 countries across Europe as well as in Chile, Colombia, China, Singapore, Malaysia, and Japan. Our corporate headquarters is still located where our company's rich history began, in the beautiful Austrian city of Salzburg. As a fully-owned subsidiary of Volkswagen AG, our business focuses on the VW Group brands Volkswagen Passenger Cars and Commercial Vehicles, Škoda, SEAT, CUPRA, Audi, Lamborghini, Bentley, Ducati and Porsche. We shape the future of mobility. Join the Porsche Holding team and be part of it.

NAICS: 42
NAICS Definition: Wholesale Trade
Employees: 10,183
Subsidiaries: 107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fastenal.jpeg
Fastenal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porsche-holding.jpeg
Porsche Holding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fastenal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Porsche Holding
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fastenal in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porsche Holding in 2025.

Incident History — Fastenal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fastenal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Porsche Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porsche Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fastenal.jpeg
Fastenal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porsche-holding.jpeg
Porsche Holding
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fastenal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Porsche Holding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Porsche Holding company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fastenal company.

In the current year, Porsche Holding company and Fastenal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Porsche Holding company nor Fastenal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Porsche Holding company nor Fastenal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Porsche Holding company nor Fastenal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fastenal company nor Porsche Holding company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fastenal nor Porsche Holding holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Porsche Holding company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fastenal company.

Fastenal company employs more people globally than Porsche Holding company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale.

Neither Fastenal nor Porsche Holding holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fastenal nor Porsche Holding holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fastenal nor Porsche Holding holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fastenal nor Porsche Holding holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fastenal nor Porsche Holding holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fastenal nor Porsche Holding holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H