Comparison Overview

Farmers Insurance Group

VS

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Farmers Insurance Group

Chicago, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.farmers.com

Farmers Insurance Group is an American insurer group of automobiles, homes and small businesses and also provides other insurance and financial services products. Farmers Insurance has more than 48,000 exclusive and independent agents and approximately 21,000 employees.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Kolkata, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.rpsg.in

The RPSG Group is one of India's fastest growing conglomerates with a significant global presence. The Group's businesses include power and energy, carbon black manufacturing, retail, IT-enabled services, FMCG, media and entertainment, and agriculture. In the last few years, the group has grown exponentially in revenue, market cap and profitability. We have made all our businesses, leaders in their respective sectors.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 33,767
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farmersinsurance-group.jpeg
Farmers Insurance Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rpsggroup.jpeg
RP Sanjiv Goenka Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Farmers Insurance Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RP Sanjiv Goenka Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Farmers Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RP Sanjiv Goenka Group in 2026.

Incident History — Farmers Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Farmers Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RP Sanjiv Goenka Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farmersinsurance-group.jpeg
Farmers Insurance Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Rogue OAuth App)
Motivation: Data Exfiltration and Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rpsggroup.jpeg
RP Sanjiv Goenka Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Farmers Insurance Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Farmers Insurance Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company and Farmers Insurance Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company nor Farmers Insurance Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company nor Farmers Insurance Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company nor Farmers Insurance Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Farmers Insurance Group company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Farmers Insurance Group nor RP Sanjiv Goenka Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Farmers Insurance Group company.

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company employs more people globally than Farmers Insurance Group company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Farmers Insurance Group nor RP Sanjiv Goenka Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance Group nor RP Sanjiv Goenka Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance Group nor RP Sanjiv Goenka Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance Group nor RP Sanjiv Goenka Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance Group nor RP Sanjiv Goenka Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance Group nor RP Sanjiv Goenka Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References