Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fano (Fano Labs)Fano (Fano Labs)
VS
Akamai TechnologiesAkamai Technologies
Fano (Fano Labs)

Fano (Fano Labs)

Units 1507 - 1511, 15/F, 19W, 19 Science Park Avenue West,, Hong Kong, 000000, HK

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fano.ai
766/1000Fair

Fano is an AI company specializing in speech and natural language processing technologies to help enterprises with their customer services, compliance, and other lines of businesses. We are particularly focusing on mixed languages in Hong Kong, Southeast Asia, and the M...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:86
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

8 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, US, 02142

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.akamai.com
732/1000Moderate

At Akamai, we make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Every day, billions of people around the world connect with their favorite brands to shop online, play the latest video games, log into mobile banking apps, learn remotely, share videos wi...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,327
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fano (Fano Labs)

Fano (Fano Labs)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fano (Fano Labs) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Akamai Technologies has 85.19% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Fano (Fano Labs) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fano (Fano Labs) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Akamai Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akamai Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fano (Fano Labs)

Fano (Fano Labs)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TOLTELAKA1777389934
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AKA1776515140
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UNIAKA1773995078

FAQ

Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fano (Fano Labs) or Akamai Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fano (Fano Labs) or Akamai Technologies ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fano (Fano Labs) and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9754
SUMMARY

An authenticated user with the read role may read limited amounts of uninitialized stack memory via specially-crafted issuances of the filemd5 command

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9753
SUMMARY

The $_internalApplyOplogUpdate aggregation pipeline stage can be used to execute a document diff containing a malformed binary diff to return memory out-of-bounds or crash the server. $_internalApplyOplogUpdate can be executed by any authenticated user with access to the aggregate command.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9752
SUMMARY

An authorized user could trigger a server crash by running a query with a 2dsphere index on a field that stores a GeoJSON GeometryCollection containing a Polygon with a strict-winding CRS. Strict-winding polygons are intentionally unsupported for indexing, but the guard that rejects them does not inspect members of a GeometryCollection, allowing the unsafe path to be reached which ends with an ensuing null-pointer dereference.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9751
SUMMARY

The ldapQueryPassword parameter, when set through the runtime setParameter command, will log the new password to the mongod.log file in plain text.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-9750
SUMMARY

An authenticated user can cause a MongoDB server to crash or return incorrect results by creating documents that interfere with internal metadata processing during query execution. This stems from insufficient separation between user-controlled document fields and internal metadata in certain execution paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8