Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

fanavagroup.cofanavagroup.co
VS
AT&TAT&T
fanavagroup.co

fanavagroup.co

No. 6, 11th alley, Sarafraz ave.,, Tehran, IR

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fanava.com
739/1000Moderate

Fanava Group is an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) service provider. Notable competitive advantages has been provided to Fanava ICT Group by its' unique Certifications (such as PAP, ISP, ISDP, PSP, NGN, SAP, GSM/WLL, IDC, etc) in various fields of Teleco...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:71
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
AT&T

AT&T

208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, 75202, US

Last Update: 25/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.att.com
100/1000Critical

We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for thi...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:194,164
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
8
Known data breaches
27
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
fanavagroup.co

fanavagroup.co

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AT&T

AT&T

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for fanavagroup.co in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

AT&T has 676.7% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - fanavagroup.co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

fanavagroup.co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
fanavagroup.co

fanavagroup.co

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FANIRI1774284457
AT&T

AT&T

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATTIBM1781168591
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OKTMICATTNVI1780611852
🔒 Incident : Breach
METORATICBANYAHATTADOAPPCOLGOO1777962591

FAQ

Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between fanavagroup.co company and AT&T company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between fanavagroup.co and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between fanavagroup.co and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - fanavagroup.co or AT&T ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - fanavagroup.co or AT&T ?
Between fanavagroup.co and AT&T, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between fanavagroup.co and AT&T, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9