Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)
VS
Marsh McLennanMarsh McLennan
Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

645 Molly Lane, Woodstock, 30189, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fams.net
721/1000Moderate

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) is an Account Recovery Solutions provider that has developed an industry-leading, multi-tiered approach to loss prevention, account rehabilitation, and revenue recovery. Our strength is in our people. FAMS'​ history of...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:149
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Marsh McLennan

Marsh McLennan

1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, US, 10036

Last Update: 18/07/2026

View Profile
810/1000Good

Marsh (NYSE: MRSH) is a global leader in risk, strategy and people, advising clients in 130 countries across four businesses: Marsh Risk, Guy Carpenter, Mercer and Oliver Wyman. With annual revenue over $24 billion and more than 90,000 ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:45,730
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marsh McLennan

Marsh McLennan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh McLennan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAM259072525
Marsh McLennan

Marsh McLennan

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MAR18242223
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR307072525

FAQ

Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) and Marsh McLennan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) and Marsh McLennan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) or Marsh McLennan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) or Marsh McLennan ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) and Marsh McLennan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) and Marsh McLennan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8