Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)
VS
AegonAegon
Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

645 Molly Lane, Woodstock, 30189, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fams.net
721/1000Moderate

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) is an Account Recovery Solutions provider that has developed an industry-leading, multi-tiered approach to loss prevention, account rehabilitation, and revenue recovery. Our strength is in our people. FAMS'​ history of...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:149
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Aegon

Aegon

Schiphol Boulevard 223, Schiphol, 1118 BH, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.aegon.com
784/1000Fair

People are living longer, and we are excited about the possibilities this brings. We see longevity, aging, and changing life patterns as an opportunity for our customers, our employees, and society as a whole. And we want to support everyone in building the financial me...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:41,246
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aegon

Aegon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aegon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aegon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aegon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAM259072525
Aegon

Aegon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) company and Aegon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) and Aegon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) and Aegon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) or Aegon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) or Aegon ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) and Aegon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc. (FAMS) and Aegon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1