Falabella- vs No-one - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

Falabella

no one

Falabella

Rosario Norte 660, Las Condes, 7561156, CL

Last Update: 24/03/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://www.falabella.com

806/1000Good

Somos un espacio físico y digital que por más de 135 años ha inspirado y enriquecido la vida de nuestros clientes. Trabajamos con las mejores marcas del mundo para brindar una experiencia especialista omnicanal en vestuario, belleza, calzado, tecnología y hogar. Buscamo...

NAICS:43

NAICS Definition:Retail Trade

Employees:25,526

Subsidiaries:16

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

no one

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Between 850 and 899

http://www.noone.ru

857/1000Very Good

Компания NO ONE более 20 лет занимает лидирующие позиции в розничном сегменте. NO ONE – один из крупнейших дистрибьюторов обуви и аксессуаров ведущих европейских брендов на российском рынке. В портфеле компании NO ONE около 50 европейских марок: Casadei, Fabi, Vici...

NAICS:43

NAICS Definition:Retail Trade

Employees:13,007

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Falabella

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

no one

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Falabella in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for no one in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Falabella (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Falabella cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - no one (X = Date, Y = Severity)

no one cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Falabella

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

no one

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Falabella company and no one company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Falabella and no one, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Falabella and no one, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Falabella or no one ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Falabella or no one ?

Between Falabella and no one, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Falabella and no one, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929

SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76928

SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76927

SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76926

SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76924

SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.8

REFERENCES