Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fairmont PittsburghFairmont Pittsburgh
VS
HiltonHilton
Fairmont Pittsburgh

Fairmont Pittsburgh

510 Market Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15222, US

Last Update: 01/11/2025

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Located at the heart of Pittsburgh’s business, cultural and retail hub, the Fairmont Pittsburgh hotel offers superb and distinctive guest services and accommodations in a luxury setting. With breathtaking views of PNC Park, the restored downtown and the Pittsburgh city ...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:53
Subsidiaries:115
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hilton

Hilton

7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, 22102, US

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://stories.hilton.com
835/1000Good

Hilton (NYSE: HLT) is a leading global hospitality company with a portfolio of 27 world-class brands comprising more than 9,100 properties and over 1.3 million rooms, in 143 countries and territories. Dedicated to fulfilling its founding vision to fill the earth with th...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:158,521
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fairmont Pittsburgh

Fairmont Pittsburgh

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hilton

Hilton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairmont Pittsburgh in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hilton in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fairmont Pittsburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairmont Pittsburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fairmont Pittsburgh

Fairmont Pittsburgh

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hilton

Hilton

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HIL1733261023

FAQ

Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh company and Hilton company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh and Hilton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh and Hilton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fairmont Pittsburgh or Hilton ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fairmont Pittsburgh or Hilton ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh and Hilton, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fairmont Pittsburgh and Hilton, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA