Comparison Overview
Fairmont Hotel Vancouver

Fairmont Hotel Vancouver
900 W Georgia St, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2W6, CA
Last Update: 19/12/2025
At the very heart of Vancouver is the historic Fairmont Hotel Vancouver. Known as the 'Castle in the City’, it reflects the timeless luxury of Canada's iconic hotels. Located just steps from Vancouver’s business, shopping and entertainment district, it is the perfec...

Mandarin Oriental
18 Westlands Road, Quarry Bay, ., HK
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group is the award-winning owner and operator of some of the world’s most luxurious hotels, resorts and residences. Having grown from its Asian roots into a global brand, the Group now operates 43 hotels, 12 residences and 23 exclusive homes in 2...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fairmont Hotel Vancouver







Mandarin Oriental






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fairmont Hotel Vancouver in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mandarin Oriental in 2026.
Incident History - Fairmont Hotel Vancouver (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fairmont Hotel Vancouver cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mandarin Oriental (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mandarin Oriental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fairmont Hotel Vancouver

Mandarin Oriental
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.