Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fairfield by MarriottFairfield by Marriott
VS
Taj HotelsTaj Hotels
Fairfield by Marriott

Fairfield by Marriott

N/A

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

Launched in 1987, Fairfield by Marriott has become a global leader in the upper midscale hotel industry tier by offering a beautifully simple stay wherever guests travel, with a calming, reliable experience characterized by warm hospitality, all at a great value. The Fa...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:6,227
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Taj Hotels

Taj Hotels

9th Floor, Express Towers,, Mumbai, 400 021, IN

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tajhotels.com
818/1000Good

Established in 1903, Taj is The Indian Hotels Company Limited’s (IHCL) iconic brand for the world’s most discerning travellers seeking luxury and authentic experiences. Taj has been rated as India’s Strongest Brand across all sectors for an unprecedented fourth time and...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:24,292
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fairfield by Marriott

Fairfield by Marriott

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Taj Hotels

Taj Hotels

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairfield by Marriott in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taj Hotels in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fairfield by Marriott (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairfield by Marriott cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Taj Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taj Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fairfield by Marriott

Fairfield by Marriott

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Taj Hotels

Taj Hotels

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott company and Taj Hotels company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott and Taj Hotels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott and Taj Hotels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fairfield by Marriott or Taj Hotels ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fairfield by Marriott or Taj Hotels ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott and Taj Hotels, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fairfield by Marriott and Taj Hotels, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA