Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EMCOR Services FaganEMCOR Services Fagan
VS
Kier GroupKier Group
EMCOR Services Fagan

EMCOR Services Fagan

3125 Brinkerhoff Road, Kansas City, 66115, US

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.faganco.com
751/1000Fair

Since 1958, The Fagan Company has been providing comprehensive mechanical contracting, maintenance, and refrigeration services. Specializing in design/build and design/assist, our preconstruction and construction capabilities meet the requirements of virtually any proje...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:42
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kier Group

Kier Group

Cavendish Place, UK, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kier.co.uk
755/1000Fair

Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:10,990
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EMCOR Services Fagan

EMCOR Services Fagan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kier Group

Kier Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EMCOR Services Fagan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EMCOR Services Fagan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EMCOR Services Fagan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EMCOR Services Fagan

EMCOR Services Fagan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kier Group

Kier Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan company and Kier Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EMCOR Services Fagan or Kier Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EMCOR Services Fagan or Kier Group ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan and Kier Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EMCOR Services Fagan and Kier Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA