Comparison Overview
The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health

The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health
The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health was formed in 2016 by bringing together the Faculty of Life Sciences and the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences. This new, integrated structure enables us to deliver a truly translational approach to the life sciences, ens...

Clemson University
201 Sikes Hall, Clemson, SC, US, 29630
Last Update: 02/04/2026
For over 130 years, Clemson University has shown unwavering dedication to the people of South Carolina. The University was founded with a land-grant mission and innovative vision — to increase the material resources of the State as a high seminary of learning. Since tha...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health







Clemson University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Clemson University has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Clemson University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Clemson University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health

Clemson University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.