Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de BordeauxFaculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux
VS
ETH ZürichETH Zürich
Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux

Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux

16, Avenue Léon Duguit, Pessac, 33600, FR

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

La faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux forme plus de 4000 étudiants chaque année. Elle est adossée sur les domaines d'expertise des laboratoires de recherche. Elle est engagée dans une stratégie de recherche de l'excellence en matière de dipl...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:17
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ETH Zürich

ETH Zürich

Rämistrasse 101, Zürich, CH, 8092

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://ethz.ch/en.html
802/1000Good

ETH Zurich – Where the future begins Freedom and individual responsibility, entrepreneurial spirit and open-mindedness: ETH Zurich stands on a bedrock of true Swiss values. Our university for science and technology dates back to the year 1855, when the founders of mode...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,567
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux

Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ETH Zürich

ETH Zürich

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ETH Zürich in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ETH Zürich (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ETH Zürich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux

Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ETH Zürich

ETH Zürich

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux company and ETH Zürich company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux and ETH Zürich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux and ETH Zürich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux or ETH Zürich ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux or ETH Zürich ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux and ETH Zürich, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Faculté d'économie, gestion et AES de l'université de Bordeaux and ETH Zürich, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2