Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FACC Wings for WomenFACC Wings for Women
VS
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
FACC Wings for Women

FACC Wings for Women

N/A

Last Update: 13/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
facc.com
747/1000Moderate

Empowerment. Career. Network. Mit dem Frauennetzwerk FACC Wings for Women wollen wir die Perspektive von Frauen im Unternehmen sichtbarer machen und stärken, sowie ein Umfeld schaffen, das allen die gleichen Chancen und Möglichkeiten eröffnet.

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

300 E Street SW, Washington, 20546, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nasa.gov
802/1000Good

For more than 60 years, NASA has been breaking barriers to achieve the seemingly impossible—from walking on the Moon to pushing the boundaries of human spaceflight farther than ever before. We work in space and around the world in laboratories and wind tunnels, on airfi...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:50,451
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FACC Wings for Women

FACC Wings for Women

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FACC Wings for Women in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FACC Wings for Women (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FACC Wings for Women cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FACC Wings for Women

FACC Wings for Women

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAS449061725
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NAS829052725
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NAS214223222

FAQ

Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FACC Wings for Women company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FACC Wings for Women and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FACC Wings for Women and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FACC Wings for Women or NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FACC Wings for Women or NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration ?
Between FACC Wings for Women and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FACC Wings for Women and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58489
SUMMARY

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time collaborative markdown notes application. Prior to 1.11.0, the GitHub Gist export flow created an OAuth2  state  value but only checked that it was present rather than validating it against the value expected for the user's session. Because the state was not properly validated, an attacker could forge a callback URL containing their own valid GitHub OAuth code. When processing the callback, HedgeDoc used the victim's logged-in session to select which note to export, but the attacker's authorization code to determine which GitHub account received it. As a result, a logged-in victim who clicked a crafted link could export their own private, protected, or limited note directly into a Gist controlled by the attacker. This issue has been fixed in version 1.11.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-58486
SUMMARY

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to version 1.11.0, HedgeDoc was vulnerable to a YAML alias bomb due to unsafe processing of the note frontmatter. HedgeDoc parsed frontmatter with js-yaml.load (js-yaml v3) via @hedgedoc/meta-marked, which resolved YAML anchor aliases. A compact malicious payload could therefore expand into a huge object structure, consuming excessive CPU. This expansion ran on every request to the publish view (/s/<shortid>) and, when placed under the opengraph key, the editor view (/<noteId>). A ten-level alias bomb could block the single Node.js event loop for roughly 235 seconds per request, causing concurrent requests to hang or drop and rendering the instance unavailable (DoS). Because the note was stored in the database, the impact survived process restarts until the note was removed. toobusy-js did not reliably mitigate the worst cases, as the event loop was saturated before the middleware could respond. This issue was fixed in version 1.11.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-58102
SUMMARY

Crypt::OpenSSL::X509 versions before 2.1.3 for Perl allow a heap out-of-bounds read via a long certificate extension OID in hv_exts. When building the extension hash (via extensions(), extensions_by_long_name(), extensions_by_oid(), or has_extension_oid()), the code passes OBJ_obj2txt()'s return value as the hash-key length; because that value is the OID's full text length rather than the bytes written to the fixed-size buffer (129 bytes), an OID whose text is longer than the 129-byte buffer causes a read past the allocation, exposing adjacent heap memory as the returned hash key. extensions_by_name() uses the static shortname path and is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-58101
SUMMARY

Crypt::OpenSSL::X509 versions before 2.1.3 for Perl allow denial of service via NULL pointer dereference. X509V3_EXT_d2i(ext) returns NULL when an extension's DER value fails to parse. basicC, ia5string, and auth_att dereference its result without a NULL check. keyid_data also dereferences akid->keyid, which is NULL for an empty AKI SEQUENCE (DER 30 00) even when the parse succeeds. A caller invoking an affected helper on an extension from an untrusted certificate triggers a SIGSEGV that crashes the Perl process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-57856
SUMMARY

Cockpit CMS contains a path traversal vulnerability in the Bucket file storage API (/system/buckets/api). The api() method in modules/System/Controller/Buckets.php sanitizes the bucket name with preg_replace('/[^a-zA-Z0-9-_\\.]/','', $bucket), which permits '..' and '../' sequences. The sanitized value is interpolated into a Flysystem path as uploads://buckets/{bucket}. Flysystem's WhitespacePathNormalizer resolves 'buckets/..' to the empty string (the uploads storage root) without raising PathTraversalDetected because the '..' has a preceding component to consume. An authenticated low-privileged user can send a crafted request with a '../' bucket name to list, upload, and delete files across all buckets, including those belonging to other users or roles

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8