Comparison Overview
F5 Labs Threat Research
F5 Labs Threat Research
401 Elliott Avenue West, Seattle, 98119, US
Last Update: 22/04/2026
Threat research. Security leadership. Decades of experience. We process app threat data from F5 and our partners into actionable intelligence, and analyze and share the Who, What, When, Why, How, & What’s Next of cyber attacks to benefit the security community.
Ricoh USA, Inc.
300 Eagleview Blvd, Exton, 19341, US
Last Update: 29/03/2026
At Ricoh, we bring people, processes, and technology together to make information work for you. We unlock the power of information so organizations can unlock the full potential of their people. We're a leader in information management and digital services, creating com...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
F5 Labs Threat Research
Ricoh USA, Inc.
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
F5 Labs Threat Research has 33.77% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ricoh USA, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - F5 Labs Threat Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)
F5 Labs Threat Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ricoh USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ricoh USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
F5 Labs Threat Research
Ricoh USA, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.