Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

F-CLEAN Greenhouse CoveringsF-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings
VS
BASFBASF
F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings

F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings

55 E. Uwchlan Avenue 19341, Exton, PA, 19341, US

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile

F-CLEAN is a fluoropolymer (ETFE) film to be used as a greenhouse covering. It improves the growth efficiency of fruits, vegetables and plans inside the greenhouse. This film has a higher transmission rate of light and UV than glass, polyethylene or polycarbonate, allow...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BASF

BASF

Carl-Bosch-Str. 38, Ludwigshafen, DE, 67056

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.basf.com
743/1000Moderate

At BASF, we create chemistry for a sustainable future. Our ambition: We want to be the preferred chemical company to enable our customers’ green transformation. We combine economic success with environmental protection and social responsibility. Around 112,000 employees...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:68,316
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings

F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BASF

BASF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

BASF has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BASF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BASF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings

F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BASF

BASF

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAYSOLHONBAS1770310511

FAQ

Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings company and BASF company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings and BASF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings and BASF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings or BASF ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings or BASF ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings and BASF, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between F-CLEAN Greenhouse Coverings and BASF, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA