Comparison Overview

EY-Parthenon

VS

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

EY-Parthenon

1 More London Place, London, United Kingdom, GB, SE1 2AF
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Our unique combination of transformative strategy, transactions and corporate finance delivers real-world value – solutions that work in practice, not just on paper. Benefiting from EY’s full spectrum of services, we’ve reimagined strategic consulting to work in a world of increasing complexity. With deep functional and sector expertise, paired with innovative AI-powered technology and an investor mindset, we partner with CEOs, boards, private equity and governments every step of the way – enabling you to shape your future with confidence. EY-Parthenon is a brand under which a number of EY member firms across the globe provide strategy consulting services. For more information, please visit ey.com/parthenon.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 15,690
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

200 Pier 4 Blvd, Boston, Massachusetts, 02210, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 800 and 849

Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we work closely with clients to embrace a transformational approach aimed at benefiting all stakeholders—empowering organizations to grow, build sustainable competitive advantage, and drive positive societal impact. Our diverse, global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives that question the status quo and spark change. BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting, technology and design, and corporate and digital ventures. We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout all levels of the client organization, fueled by the goal of helping our clients thrive and enabling them to make the world a better place. BCG Privacy Policy: https://www.bcg.com/about/privacy-policy.aspx

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 37,117
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ey-parthenon.jpeg
EY-Parthenon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-consulting-group.jpeg
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EY-Parthenon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EY-Parthenon in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in 2025.

Incident History — EY-Parthenon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EY-Parthenon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ey-parthenon.jpeg
EY-Parthenon
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: publicly accessible unprotected database backup (.BAK file)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: cloud bucket misconfiguration (publicly accessible storage)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party service vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-consulting-group.jpeg
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EY-Parthenon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EY-Parthenon company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company has not reported any.

In the current year, EY-Parthenon company has reported more cyber incidents than Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company.

Neither Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company nor EY-Parthenon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

EY-Parthenon company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company nor EY-Parthenon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EY-Parthenon company nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EY-Parthenon nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EY-Parthenon company.

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company employs more people globally than EY-Parthenon company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither EY-Parthenon nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EY-Parthenon nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EY-Parthenon nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EY-Parthenon nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EY-Parthenon nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EY-Parthenon nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X