Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China
VS
EcopetrolEcopetrol
埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China

埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China

No. 1 Jianguomenwai Avenue, Beijing, 100004, CN

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
744/1000Moderate

埃克森美孚是全球知名的上市国际能源公司,采用先进技术和创新帮助满足全球不断增长的能源需求。埃克森美孚拥有行业领先的资源储量,是全球主要的炼油商和石油产品销售商,其化工公司在全球名列前茅。 埃克森美孚在中国的历史可追溯到1892年。目前,公司在中国的业务涵盖能源行业的各个领域,包括上游(天然气)、下游、化工和研发中心。 ExxonMobil, one of the largest publicly traded international energy companies, uses technology and innovatio...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:130
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

Cra. 13 No. 36-24, Bogotá, ----, CO

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ecopetrol.com.co
795/1000Fair

Ecopetrol (NYSE: EC) es la compañía más grande en Colombia y uno de los principales grupos de energía de Latinoamérica. Cuenta con más de 18.000 empleados y es responsable del 60% de la producción de hidrocarburos en Colombia. Es propietaria de las dos refinerías del Co...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:12,683
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China

埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ecopetrol in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ecopetrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecopetrol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China

埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China and Ecopetrol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China and Ecopetrol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China or Ecopetrol ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China or Ecopetrol ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China and Ecopetrol, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 埃克森美孚中国 ExxonMobil China and Ecopetrol, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-54236
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.23.1rc0, the fix for CVE-2026-22778, which introduced a sanitize_message helper that strips object-repr memory addresses from error messages before they reach the client, is incomplete: several response paths echo str(exc) directly to clients without calling sanitize_message. The unsanitized sites include the Anthropic API router in vllm/entrypoints/anthropic/api_router.py (the POST /v1/messages and POST /v1/messages/count_tokens handlers), the Server-Sent Events streaming converter in vllm/entrypoints/anthropic/serving.py, and the realtime speech-to-text WebSocket in vllm/entrypoints/speech_to_text/realtime/connection.py. These paths catch the exception inside the route coroutine and construct the JSONResponse themselves, bypassing the sanitizing global FastAPI exception handler, and WebSocket frames do not traverse that handler chain at all. Using the same primitive as the parent issue, an unauthenticated attacker can send malformed image bytes through the Anthropic Messages API image content parts so that PIL.Image.open raises an UnidentifiedImageError whose message contains the BytesIO object repr, leaking the heap memory address verbatim in the error.message field of the response body. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.1rc0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-22
UPDATED
Date2026-06-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54235
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.23.1rc0, ll temperature validation gates use comparison operators (<, >), which silently evaluate to False for NaN and for positive Infinity in Python's IEEE 754 float semantics. Both values pass every guard and propagate to GPU sampling kernels, where they produce undefined behavior or CUDA errors that can crash the inference worker. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.1rc0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-22
UPDATED
Date2026-06-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54233
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.23.1rc0, vLLM's /v1/audio/transcriptions endpoint limits compressed upload size but not decoded PCM output. A 25MB OPUS file expands to ~14.9GB of float32 PCM at decode time. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.1rc0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-22
UPDATED
Date2026-06-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54232
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.1, the vLLM Dockerfile is vulnerable to a dependency confusion attack through the flashinfer-jit-cache package. The package is installed from a custom index (flashinfer.ai/whl/) using --extra-index-url, but the package name was not registered on PyPI, and UV_INDEX_STRATEGY="unsafe-best-match" is set globally. An attacker who registers flashinfer-jit-cache on PyPI with version 0.6.11.post2 can execute arbitrary code as root during the Docker build and backdoor every resulting container image, enabling exfiltration of all user prompts, API credentials, and model data from production vLLM deployments This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-22
UPDATED
Date2026-06-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-53923
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). From 0.5.5 until 0.23.1rc0, integer truncation of tensor dimensions in vLLM's GGUF dequantize kernels (csrc/quantization/gguf/gguf_kernel.cu) causes partial tensor processing. The output tensor is allocated at full size via torch::empty (uninitialized memory), but the dequantize CUDA kernel processes only a truncated number of elements. The unfilled portion of the output tensor retains whatever was previously in GPU memory. In multi-tenant inference deployments, this residual GPU memory may contain tensor data from other users' inference requests, constituting information disclosure. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.1rc0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-22
UPDATED
Date2026-06-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA