Comparison Overview

ExxonMobil

VS

TechnipFMC

ExxonMobil

US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.exxonmobil.com

The need for energy is universal. That's why ExxonMobil scientists and engineers are pioneering new research and pursuing new technologies to reduce emissions while creating more efficient fuels. We're committed to responsibly meeting the world's energy needs. We aim to achieve #netzero emissions from our operated assets by 2050 (for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions) and are taking a comprehensive approach to create emission-reduction roadmaps for major operated assets. Find us also on: YouTube.com/ExxonMobil Find our latest Privacy Policy at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/Global-legal-pages/privacy-policy See our terms and conditions at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/global-legal-pages/terms-and-conditions Find resources on our GHG emission reduction efforts here: https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/resources

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 66,908
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

TechnipFMC

Hadrian House, Wincomblee Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE6 3PL, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799
http://technipfmc.com

TechnipFMC is a leading technology provider to the traditional and new energies industry, delivering fully integrated projects, products, and services. With our proprietary technologies and comprehensive solutions, we are transforming our clients’ project economics, helping them unlock new possibilities to develop energy resources while reducing carbon intensity and supporting their energy transition ambitions. Organized in two business segments — Subsea and Surface Technologies — we will continue to advance the industry with our pioneering integrated ecosystems (such as iEPCI™, iFEED™ and iComplete™), technology leadership and digital innovation. Each of our approximately 20,000 employees is driven by a commitment to our clients’ success, and a culture of strong execution, purposeful innovation, and challenging industry conventions. To learn more about us and how we are enhancing the performance of the world’s energy industry, go to TechnipFMC.com.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 38,099
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exxonmobil.jpeg
ExxonMobil
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technipfmc.jpeg
TechnipFMC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ExxonMobil
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TechnipFMC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechnipFMC in 2026.

Incident History — ExxonMobil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ExxonMobil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TechnipFMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechnipFMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exxonmobil.jpeg
ExxonMobil
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: To protect corporate interests amid environmental scrutiny
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technipfmc.jpeg
TechnipFMC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ExxonMobil company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TechnipFMC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ExxonMobil company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TechnipFMC company has not reported any.

In the current year, TechnipFMC company and ExxonMobil company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TechnipFMC company nor ExxonMobil company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ExxonMobil company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other TechnipFMC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TechnipFMC company nor ExxonMobil company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ExxonMobil company nor TechnipFMC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ExxonMobil nor TechnipFMC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ExxonMobil company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TechnipFMC company.

ExxonMobil company employs more people globally than TechnipFMC company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither ExxonMobil nor TechnipFMC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor TechnipFMC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor TechnipFMC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor TechnipFMC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor TechnipFMC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor TechnipFMC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References