Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ExxonMobil IndonesiaExxonMobil Indonesia
VS
TechnipFMCTechnipFMC
ExxonMobil Indonesia

ExxonMobil Indonesia

Jakarta, ID

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.exxonmobil.co.id
749/1000Moderate

ExxonMobil is proud to be one of Indonesia’s trusted partners in developing its energy resources. ExxonMobil has more than 125 years of presence in the Nusantara archipelago, beginning in 1898 with the Company’s first marketing office opens in Java. Then in 1912, the S...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

Hadrian House, Wincomblee Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE6 3PL, GB

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://technipfmc.com
793/1000Fair

TechnipFMC is a leading technology provider to the traditional and new energies industry, delivering fully integrated projects, products, and services. With our proprietary technologies and comprehensive solutions, we are transforming our clients’ project economics, h...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:38,099
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ExxonMobil Indonesia

ExxonMobil Indonesia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil Indonesia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechnipFMC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ExxonMobil Indonesia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ExxonMobil Indonesia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TechnipFMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechnipFMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ExxonMobil Indonesia

ExxonMobil Indonesia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TechnipFMC

TechnipFMC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia company and TechnipFMC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia and TechnipFMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia and TechnipFMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ExxonMobil Indonesia or TechnipFMC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ExxonMobil Indonesia or TechnipFMC ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia and TechnipFMC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ExxonMobil Indonesia and TechnipFMC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2