Comparison Overview
ExxonMobil Global Land Fuels

ExxonMobil Global Land Fuels
22777 Springwoods Village Parkway Spring, Spring, US
Last Update: 22/01/2026
Land transportation is vital to modern life, carrying people and goods throughout the world to meet the needs of society and economic growth. And, as the ambitions to transport more and decarbonize faster continue to grow, the sector is undergoing transformation like ne...

CB&I
1725 Hughes Landing Blvd, The Woodlands, 77380, US
Last Update: 07/09/2026
CB&I is the world’s leading designer and builder of storage facilities, tanks, and terminals. With more than 60,000 structures completed throughout its 135+ year history, CB&I has the global expertise and strategically located operations to provide its customers world-c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ExxonMobil Global Land Fuels







CB&I






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil Global Land Fuels in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CB&I in 2026.
Incident History - ExxonMobil Global Land Fuels (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ExxonMobil Global Land Fuels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CB&I (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CB&I cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ExxonMobil Global Land Fuels

CB&I
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.