Comparison Overview
ExxonMobil Brasil

ExxonMobil Brasil
Rio de Janeiro, BR
Last Update: 19/02/2026
Somos uma empresa global, presentes em seis continentes com atuação em diferentes linhas, como: exploração e produção, distribuição, químicos, gás natural e comercialização de energia. No mundo, são 70.000 homens e mulheres fazendo a diferença em nossos negócios. Há ma...

aramco
P.O. Box 5000, Dhahran, SA, 31311
Last Update: 03/09/2026
We’re a leading producer of the energy and chemicals that drive global commerce and enhance the daily lives of people around the globe by continuing delivering an uninterrupted supply of energy to the world. Our resilience and agility has built one of the world’s large...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ExxonMobil Brasil







aramco






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil Brasil in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for aramco in 2026.
Incident History - ExxonMobil Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ExxonMobil Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - aramco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
aramco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ExxonMobil Brasil

aramco
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.