Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Extant AerospaceExtant Aerospace
VS
Northrop GrummanNorthrop Grumman
Extant Aerospace

Extant Aerospace

1615 W. NASA Blvd, Melbourne, 32901, US

Last Update: 14/05/2026

View Profile
632/1000Poor

Extant Aerospace manufactures and supplies complex electronic assemblies to the DOD and international customers for military and commercial applications. The company offers digital communications solutions including a full line of Improved Data Modems (IDM) in various h...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:155
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman

2980 Fairview Park Dr, Falls Church, 22042, US

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

We are a close-knit community of big thinkers collaborating to keep the world safe. Our passion, creativity and expertise bring next-level technology solutions to life in autonomous systems, cyber, C4ISR, strike, space, and logistics and modernization for our customers ...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:81,287
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Extant Aerospace

Extant Aerospace

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Extant Aerospace in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Northrop Grumman has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Extant Aerospace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Extant Aerospace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Northrop Grumman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northrop Grumman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Extant Aerospace

Extant Aerospace

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
EXT1778783531
Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOCULANOR1777876145
🔒 Incident : Breach
NOR933072725

FAQ

Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Extant Aerospace company and Northrop Grumman company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Extant Aerospace and Northrop Grumman, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Extant Aerospace and Northrop Grumman, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Extant Aerospace or Northrop Grumman ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Extant Aerospace or Northrop Grumman ?
Between Extant Aerospace and Northrop Grumman, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Extant Aerospace and Northrop Grumman, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA