Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Global Trade Review (GTR)Global Trade Review (GTR)
VS
IntertekIntertek
Global Trade Review (GTR)

Global Trade Review (GTR)

4 Hillgate Place, London, undefined, SW12 9ER, GB

Last Update: 22/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gtreview.com
754/1000Fair

GTR is the world’s leading news source, publisher and event organiser for the global trade, commodity, export and supply chain finance industries, with offices in London and Singapore. Through our market-leading magazine Global Trade Review (GTR), we provide essentia...

NAICS:522
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:103
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Intertek

Intertek

33 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0PS, GB

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.intertek.com
785/1000Fair

Intertek is a leading Total Quality Assurance provider to industries worldwide. Our network of more than 1,000 laboratories and offices in more than 100 countries, delivers innovative and bespoke Assurance, Testing, Inspection and Certification solutions for our custom...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:30,364
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Global Trade Review (GTR)

Global Trade Review (GTR)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Intertek

Intertek

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Trade Review (GTR) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intertek in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Global Trade Review (GTR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Trade Review (GTR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Intertek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intertek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Global Trade Review (GTR)

Global Trade Review (GTR)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Intertek

Intertek

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) company and Intertek company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) and Intertek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) and Intertek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Global Trade Review (GTR) or Intertek ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Global Trade Review (GTR) or Intertek ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) and Intertek, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Global Trade Review (GTR) and Intertek, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3