Comparison Overview
Experience LLC

Experience LLC
3535 Piedmont Rd., Atlanta, 30305, US
Last Update: 09/03/2026
Our mobile ticketing technology empowers sports and entertainment leaders to unlock inventory opportunities and give fans better experiences through ticketing flexibility. Partnering with over 350 global sports and entertainment properties, we are a 2019 Atlanta Inno w...

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
1000 Ballpark Way, Arlington, 76011, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Welcome to Six Flags Entertainment Corporation! We are North America’s largest regional amusement-resort operator, with 20 amusement parks, 14 water parks and 9 resort properties across 13 states in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. The Company also manages an amusement pa...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Experience LLC







Six Flags Entertainment Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Experience LLC in 2026.
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - Experience LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Experience LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Experience LLC

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.