Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Experian Data QualityExperian Data Quality
VS
GrouponGroupon
Experian Data Quality

Experian Data Quality

1 Beacon St, Floor 33, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02108

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.edq.com
753/1000Fair

We empower businesses with data they can trust. In a world powered by data, your company needs the right tools and resources to prosper. At Experian, we've helped countless businesses just like yours navigate the realm of digital acceleration with trusted data validati...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:179
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Groupon

Groupon

600 W Chicago, Chicago, 60654, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
741/1000Moderate

Groupon is an experiences marketplace that brings people more ways to get the most out of their city or wherever they may be. By enabling real-time mobile commerce across local businesses, live events and travel destinations, Groupon helps people find and discover exper...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,563
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Experian Data Quality

Experian Data Quality

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Groupon

Groupon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Experian Data Quality in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Experian Data Quality (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Experian Data Quality cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Groupon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Experian Data Quality

Experian Data Quality

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Groupon

Groupon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GRO184224323

FAQ

Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Experian Data Quality company and Groupon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Experian Data Quality and Groupon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Experian Data Quality and Groupon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Experian Data Quality or Groupon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Experian Data Quality or Groupon ?
Between Experian Data Quality and Groupon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Experian Data Quality and Groupon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA