Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Exeter FinanceExeter Finance
VS
PING ANPING AN
Exeter Finance

Exeter Finance

P.O. Box 166008, Irving, 75016, US

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.exeterfinance.com
695/1000Weak

At Exeter, we are committed to helping consumers find the right financing for their next vehicle purchase. We work with thousands of franchised and independent auto dealers nationwide to make vehicle ownership possible for everyone. We have helped more than one million...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,718
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
PING AN

PING AN

No. 5033 Yitian Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518046, CN

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://group.pingan.com/
830/1000Good

This is the official Company Page of Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (HKEx: 2318; SSE: 601318; ADR: PNGAY). Ping An strives to become a world leading technology-powered financial services group. We believe the way people receive financial services an...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:51,286
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Exeter Finance

Exeter Finance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PING AN

PING AN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Exeter Finance has 45.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PING AN in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Exeter Finance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exeter Finance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PING AN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PING AN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Exeter Finance

Exeter Finance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EXE1782837303
PING AN

PING AN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Exeter Finance company and PING AN company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Exeter Finance and PING AN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Exeter Finance and PING AN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Exeter Finance or PING AN ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Exeter Finance or PING AN ?
Between Exeter Finance and PING AN, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Exeter Finance and PING AN, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94056
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94055
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94054
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-93993
SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8