Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Exertis AV BeneluxExertis AV Benelux
VS
Deutsche TelekomDeutsche Telekom
Exertis AV Benelux

Exertis AV Benelux

Plaza 8A, Moerdijk, 4782 SK, NL

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Exertis AV distribueert producten en diensten van topmerken op het gebied van Unified Collaboration, professionele audio/visuele middelen en alle bijbehorende accessoires. Denk hierbij aan alle mogelijkheden op het gebied van de hybride vergaderplek, het inrichten van ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:30
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Deutsche Telekom

Deutsche Telekom

Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 140, Bonn, Germany, DE, 53113

Last Update: 08/08/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Welcome to Deutsche Telekom. As one of the world's most valuable brands, we design innovative solutions and products in the areas of connectivity, networks, digitalization and security. #connectingyourworld At Deutsche Telekom, we believe that each and every one of us...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:66,526
Subsidiaries:59
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Exertis AV Benelux

Exertis AV Benelux

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Deutsche Telekom

Deutsche Telekom

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exertis AV Benelux in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Deutsche Telekom has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Exertis AV Benelux (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exertis AV Benelux cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Deutsche Telekom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Telekom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Exertis AV Benelux

Exertis AV Benelux

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Deutsche Telekom

Deutsche Telekom

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOV1776717678

FAQ

Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux company and Deutsche Telekom company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux and Deutsche Telekom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux and Deutsche Telekom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Exertis AV Benelux or Deutsche Telekom ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Exertis AV Benelux or Deutsche Telekom ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux and Deutsche Telekom, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Exertis AV Benelux and Deutsche Telekom, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA