Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ExentecExentec
VS
Nippon Steel CorporationNippon Steel Corporation
Exentec

Exentec

N/A

Last Update: 03/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.exentec.net/
746/1000Moderate

Exentec was established as a global leader in the delivery of mission-critical and integrated solutions for high-tech industries. We empower our customers through turnkey technologies and services that drive performance, sustainability, and growth across the entire faci...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:242
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nippon Steel Corporation

Nippon Steel Corporation

2-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8071, Japan, Tokyo, 2-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8071, Japan, JP, 〒100-8071

Last Update: 07/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nipponsteel.com/
785/1000Fair

<Nippon Steel Corporation does not recognize this account as OFFICIAL, but it is open for LinkedIn subscribers.> On April 1, 2019, we renamed ourselves as “Nippon Steel Corporation” (from Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation), to keep in pace with our advance as...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:695
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Exentec

Exentec

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nippon Steel Corporation

Nippon Steel Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exentec in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nippon Steel Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Exentec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exentec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nippon Steel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nippon Steel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Exentec

Exentec

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nippon Steel Corporation

Nippon Steel Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Exentec company and Nippon Steel Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Exentec and Nippon Steel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Exentec and Nippon Steel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Exentec or Nippon Steel Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Exentec or Nippon Steel Corporation ?
Between Exentec and Nippon Steel Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Exentec and Nippon Steel Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2