Comparison Overview

Example, Inc

VS

Sage

Example, Inc

None
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

None

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Sage

North Park, Newcastle upon Tyne, undefined, NE13 9AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

At Sage, we knock down barriers with information, insights, and tools to help your business flow. We provide businesses with software and services that are simple and easy to use, as we work with you to give you that feeling of confidence. Customers trust our Payroll, HR, and Finance software to make business flow with ease. From our local network of experts to our ever-growing partnerships, we are on hand to give you all the insights you need to thrive. 💚

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 14,135
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Example, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sage-software.jpeg
Sage
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Example, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sage
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Example, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sage in 2025.

Incident History — Example, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Example, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sage (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sage cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Example, Inc
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: MOVEit file transfer system
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sage-software.jpeg
Sage
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured Databases
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sage company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Example, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sage company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Example, Inc company.

In the current year, Sage company and Example, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sage company nor Example, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sage company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Example, Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Example, Inc company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sage company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Example, Inc company nor Sage company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Example, Inc nor Sage holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sage company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Example, Inc company.

Neither Example, Inc nor Sage holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Sage holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Sage holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Sage holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Sage holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Sage holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N