Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ExaltExalt
VS
ZAMPZAMP
Exalt

Exalt

123, Avenue de la République, Châtillon, Île-de-France, 92320, FR

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://exalt.fr/
758/1000Fair

Des restaurants bouillonnants d’inspiration ! Exalt est la marque pour les entreprises et sièges sociaux implantés à Paris et en région parisienne recherchant une expérience inédite pour leurs convives. Exalt veut faire des espaces de restauration le cœur vivant et insp...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ZAMP

ZAMP

São Paulo, 05501-050, BR

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.zamp.com.br/
787/1000Fair

Somos um grande ecossistema de restaurantes que reúne marcas internacionais como Burger King®, Popeyes®, Starbucks® e Subway®. E, por trás de cada receita de sucesso, estão os Zampers: gente que faz acontecer, que joga junto e que deixa sua marca todos os dias. Aqui,...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:12,420
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Exalt

Exalt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ZAMP

ZAMP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exalt in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZAMP in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Exalt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exalt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ZAMP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZAMP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Exalt

Exalt

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ZAMP

ZAMP

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Exalt company and ZAMP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Exalt and ZAMP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Exalt and ZAMP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Exalt or ZAMP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Exalt or ZAMP ?
Between Exalt and ZAMP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Exalt and ZAMP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2