Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Exablox (now part of StorageCraft)Exablox (now part of StorageCraft)
VS
Seagate TechnologySeagate Technology
Exablox (now part of StorageCraft)

Exablox (now part of StorageCraft)

1156 Sonora Ct, Sunnyvale, California, 94086, US

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.storagecraft.com
751/1000Fair

Based in Mountain View, California, Exablox is a well-funded early stage start-up creating a scalable and easy-to-manage storage solution to address the pain points of a large number of organizations. The company's product is a hybrid converged storage appliance that pr...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Seagate Technology

Seagate Technology

47488 Kato Rd, Fremont, CA, US, 94538

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.seagate.com
816/1000Good

Seagate is a leader in mass-capacity data storage. We’ve delivered more than four and a half billion terabytes of capacity over the past four decades. We make storage that scales, bringing trust and integrity to innovations that depend on data. In an era of unprecedente...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:16,441
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Exablox (now part of StorageCraft)

Exablox (now part of StorageCraft)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Seagate Technology

Seagate Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seagate Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Seagate Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seagate Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Exablox (now part of StorageCraft)

Exablox (now part of StorageCraft)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Seagate Technology

Seagate Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEA05319522
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEA914072825

FAQ

Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) company and Seagate Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) and Seagate Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) and Seagate Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) or Seagate Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) or Seagate Technology ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) and Seagate Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Exablox (now part of StorageCraft) and Seagate Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA