Comparison Overview
Exa Corporation

Exa Corporation
55 Network Drive, Burlington, MA, 01803, US
Last Update: 25/01/2026
Exa, part of SIMULIA a Dassault Systèmes brand, provides simulation and visualization software that predicts the real world performance of products early in the design process. Every day engineers and designers rely on Exa’s highly accurate results to gain actionable i...

Cadence
2655 Seely Avenue, San Jose, California, US, 95134
Last Update: 19/07/2026
Cadence is a market leader in AI and digital twins, pioneering the application of computational software to accelerate innovation in the engineering design of silicon to systems. Our design solutions, based on Cadence’s Intelligent System Design™ strategy, are essential...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Exa Corporation







Cadence






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Exa Corporation in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cadence in 2026.
Incident History - Exa Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Exa Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cadence (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cadence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Exa Corporation

Cadence
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.