Comparison Overview
Evonik Interface Additives

Evonik Interface Additives
Goldschmidtstraße 100, Essen, 45127, DE
Last Update: 01/02/2026
Our business line delivers cutting-edge specialty additives and polyurethane technologies that empower customers to achieve superior performance, efficiency, and sustainability across diverse applications. Beyond the Surface: Where Innovation Meets Performance – this is...

AkzoNobel
Christian Neefestraat 2, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, NL, 1077 WW
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Since 1792, we’ve been supplying the innovative paints and coatings that help to color people’s lives and protect what matters most. Our world class portfolio of brands – including Dulux, International, Sikkens and Interpon – is trusted by customers around the globe. We...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Evonik Interface Additives







AkzoNobel






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Evonik Interface Additives in 2026.
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
AkzoNobel has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Evonik Interface Additives (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Evonik Interface Additives cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AkzoNobel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AkzoNobel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Evonik Interface Additives

AkzoNobel
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.