Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EVO BancoEVO Banco
VS
Credit SuisseCredit Suisse
EVO Banco

EVO Banco

C/ Don Ramón de la Cruz, 84 , Madrid, 28006, ES

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.evobanco.com
667/1000Weak

EVO es una nueva manera de hacer banca, una banca inteligente, evolucionada, sencilla y transparente. Desarrollamos nuestra actividad en todo el ámbito nacional, excepto Galicia, Asturias y León. Tenemos nuestra sede central en Madrid y contamos con una red de oficin...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:184
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Credit Suisse

Credit Suisse

Paradeplatz 8, Zurich, 8070, CH

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
822/1000Good

Credit Suisse Group AG has been acquired by UBS Group AG. UBS is the world’s largest and only truly global wealth manager. We operate through four business divisions: Global Wealth Management, Personal & Corporate Banking, Asset Management, and the Investment Bank. Ou...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:17,331
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EVO Banco

EVO Banco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Credit Suisse

Credit Suisse

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EVO Banco in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Credit Suisse in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EVO Banco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EVO Banco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Credit Suisse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Credit Suisse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EVO Banco

EVO Banco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EVOBAN1777652813
Credit Suisse

Credit Suisse

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRE000072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRE214125123
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRE441072925

FAQ

Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EVO Banco company and Credit Suisse company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EVO Banco and Credit Suisse, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EVO Banco and Credit Suisse, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EVO Banco or Credit Suisse ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EVO Banco or Credit Suisse ?
Between EVO Banco and Credit Suisse, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EVO Banco and Credit Suisse, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8