Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Evil Corp - The BoardgameEvil Corp - The Boardgame
VS
The Walt Disney CompanyThe Walt Disney Company
Evil Corp - The Boardgame

Evil Corp - The Boardgame

66 Ability Plaza, London, E8 4DT, GB

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://evilcorpgame.com
734/1000Moderate

The last time a boardgame was launched which reflected the dominant economic and political mores of it's time, we got Monopoly. Today, we get Evil Corp. Designed as both game and social commentary, it's incredibly fun to play, and by the end you might think differen...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company, Burbank, 91521, US

Last Update: 03/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.disneycareers.com
663/1000Weak

The Walt Disney Company, together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading diversified international family entertainment and media enterprise that includes three core business segments: Disney Entertainment, ESPN, and Disney Experiences. Our mission is to en...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:183,295
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Evil Corp - The Boardgame

Evil Corp - The Boardgame

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

Evil Corp - The Boardgame has 55.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Walt Disney Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Evil Corp - The Boardgame (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Evil Corp - The Boardgame cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Walt Disney Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Walt Disney Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Evil Corp - The Boardgame

Evil Corp - The Boardgame

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
EVI1781864638
The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TOYTHEFED1773051888
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HIT2032020092925
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE409030225

FAQ

Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame and The Walt Disney Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame and The Walt Disney Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Evil Corp - The Boardgame or The Walt Disney Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Evil Corp - The Boardgame or The Walt Disney Company ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame and The Walt Disney Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Evil Corp - The Boardgame and The Walt Disney Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2