Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company)Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company)
VS
RR DonnelleyRR Donnelley
Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company)

Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company)

N/A

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Everywhere, an MWW company, is a social-first influencer marketing and digital engagement firm specializing in omni-channel strategies, authentic creator partnerships, and high-impact content production at scale. Launched in 2024 by MikeWorldWide, Everywhere combines da...

NAICS:5418
NAICS Definition:Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RR Donnelley

RR Donnelley

227 W Monroe St, Chicago, 60606, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rrd.com
726/1000Moderate

RRD provides a complete portfolio of marketing, packaging, print and business services to the world’s most respected brands, including 91% of the Fortune 100. Our proprietary technology, advanced data analytics and established expertise fuel organizational decision-ma...

NAICS:5418
NAICS Definition:Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services
Employees:40,800
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company)

Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RR Donnelley

RR Donnelley

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RR Donnelley in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RR Donnelley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RR Donnelley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company)

Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RR Donnelley

RR Donnelley

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RR-435072725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RRD31219222
🔒 Incident : Breach
RR-1011091725

FAQ

Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) company and RR Donnelley company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) and RR Donnelley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) and RR Donnelley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) or RR Donnelley ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) or RR Donnelley ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) and RR Donnelley, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Everywhere Agency (a MikeWorldWide Company) and RR Donnelley, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2