Comparison Overview
Eversource Energy
Eversource Energy
56 Prospect Street, Hartford, 06103, US
Last Update: 22/05/2026
Eversource Energy (NYSE:ES), a Fortune 500 and Standard & Poor’s 500 energy company based in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, operates New England’s largest energy delivery system. Eversource is committed to safety, reliability, environmental leadership and...
Southern Company
30 Ivan Allen Jr Blvd, Atlanta, GA, US, 30308
Last Update: 05/10/2026
Together with our subsidiaries, we deliver clean, safe, reliable and affordable energy to our 9 million customers. Our focus is doing so with service excellence. That means we are leaders who take action to meet our customers’ and communities’ needs while advancing ou...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Eversource Energy
Southern Company
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
Eversource Energy has 45.36% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
Southern Company has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Eversource Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Eversource Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Southern Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Southern Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Eversource Energy
Southern Company
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.