Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EvergreenHealthEvergreenHealth
VS
Region HovedstadenRegion Hovedstaden
EvergreenHealth

EvergreenHealth

12040 NE 128th Street, Kirkland, 98034, US

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
603/1000Poor

EvergreenHealth, a public hospital district and community-owned health care system established in 1972, offers a breadth of services and programs that is among the most comprehensive in the region. With two hospitals in Kirkland and Monroe and dozens of practices acros...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:3,328
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
Region Hovedstaden

Region Hovedstaden

Kongens Vaenge 2, Hillerod, 3400, DK

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.regionh.dk/job
783/1000Fair

Det handler om liv. Om at bringe liv til verden og skabe livskvalitet. Om at redde liv og forbedre liv. Som medarbejder i Region Hovedstaden træder du ind i en verden af muligheder og mangfoldighed med plads til dine ambitioner. Du er en del af et stærkt fagligt miljø, ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:23,626
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EvergreenHealth

EvergreenHealth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Region Hovedstaden

Region Hovedstaden

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

EvergreenHealth has 28.57% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Region Hovedstaden in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EvergreenHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EvergreenHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Region Hovedstaden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Region Hovedstaden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EvergreenHealth

EvergreenHealth

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EVE1783378301
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SOUEVE1772103925
🔒 Incident : Breach
EVE3811622
Region Hovedstaden

Region Hovedstaden

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EvergreenHealth company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EvergreenHealth and Region Hovedstaden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EvergreenHealth and Region Hovedstaden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EvergreenHealth or Region Hovedstaden ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EvergreenHealth or Region Hovedstaden ?
Between EvergreenHealth and Region Hovedstaden, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EvergreenHealth and Region Hovedstaden, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8