Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

City of Everett, WACity of Everett, WA
VS
CONICETCONICET
City of Everett, WA

City of Everett, WA

2930 Wetmore Avenue, Everett, 98201, US

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://everettwa.gov
737/1000Moderate

The City of Everett serves a vibrant, growing and diverse community on the Port Gardner Bay, 25 miles north of Seattle. The county seat of Snohomish County, Everett is the sixth largest city in Washington with a population of nearly 110,000. We have over 250 job title...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:648
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
CONICET

CONICET

Godoy Cruz 2290, CABA, C1425FQB, AR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.conicet.gov.ar
782/1000Fair

El Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) es el principal organismo dedicado a la promoción de la ciencia y la tecnología en la Argentina. Su actividad se desarrolla en cuatro grandes áreas: • Ciencias agrarias, ingeniería y de materiales •...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,752
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
City of Everett, WA

City of Everett, WA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CONICET

CONICET

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

City of Everett, WA has 33.77% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CONICET in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - City of Everett, WA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Everett, WA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CONICET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CONICET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
City of Everett, WA

City of Everett, WA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
EVE1788834220
CONICET

CONICET

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between City of Everett, WA company and CONICET company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between City of Everett, WA and CONICET, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between City of Everett, WA and CONICET, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - City of Everett, WA or CONICET ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - City of Everett, WA or CONICET ?
Between City of Everett, WA and CONICET, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between City of Everett, WA and CONICET, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8