Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Everest Global Services Private Ltd.Everest Global Services Private Ltd.
VS
VFS GlobalVFS Global
Everest Global Services Private Ltd.

Everest Global Services Private Ltd.

ILD TRADE CENTRE, GURGAON, 122018, IN

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://everestglobal.co.in
723/1000Moderate

Everest Global is a team of enthusiastic Accountants who love the "The Accounting" Accounting we offer makes it possible for companies to focus their energies where their moat is and not worry a moment on back-office Your Back office is Our Front Office

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
VFS Global

VFS Global

Unit 201, Level 2, Gate Village 8, DIFC, P.O. Box 114100, Dubai, AE

Last Update: 16/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.vfsglobal.com
706/1000Moderate

As the global leader in trusted technology services, empowering secure mobility for governments and citizens, VFS Global embraces technological innovation including Generative AI to support governments and diplomatic missions worldwide. VFS Global continuously transform...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,742
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Everest Global Services Private Ltd.

Everest Global Services Private Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VFS Global

VFS Global

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Everest Global Services Private Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

VFS Global has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Everest Global Services Private Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Everest Global Services Private Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VFS Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VFS Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Everest Global Services Private Ltd.

Everest Global Services Private Ltd.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EVE632072825
VFS Global

VFS Global

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VFS1784205219

FAQ

Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. company and VFS Global company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. and VFS Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. and VFS Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Everest Global Services Private Ltd. or VFS Global ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Everest Global Services Private Ltd. or VFS Global ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. and VFS Global, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Everest Global Services Private Ltd. and VFS Global, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA