Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Events @ Newcastle UniversityEvents @ Newcastle University
VS
Clemson UniversityClemson University
Events @ Newcastle University

Events @ Newcastle University

Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, GB

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Discover what's happening at Newcastle University.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Clemson University

Clemson University

201 Sikes Hall, Clemson, SC, US, 29630

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://go.tig.rs/r2mdym
730/1000Moderate

For over 130 years, Clemson University has shown unwavering dedication to the people of South Carolina. The University was founded with a land-grant mission and innovative vision — to increase the material resources of the State as a high seminary of learning. Since tha...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,690
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Events @ Newcastle University

Events @ Newcastle University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Clemson University

Clemson University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Events @ Newcastle University in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Clemson University has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Events @ Newcastle University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Events @ Newcastle University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Clemson University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clemson University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Events @ Newcastle University

Events @ Newcastle University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Clemson University

Clemson University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

FAQ

Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University company and Clemson University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University and Clemson University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University and Clemson University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Events @ Newcastle University or Clemson University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Events @ Newcastle University or Clemson University ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University and Clemson University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Events @ Newcastle University and Clemson University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8