Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Eurofactor Polska S.A.Eurofactor Polska S.A.
VS
Tata CapitalTata Capital
Eurofactor Polska S.A.

Eurofactor Polska S.A.

Żwirki i Wigury, Warszawa, woj. mazowieckie, 02-092, PL

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eurofactor.pl
753/1000Fair

Eurofactor Polska S.A. jest spółką należącą do Europejskiego Funduszu Leasingowego S.A, który jest częścią Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring, najważniejszego uczestnika sektora leasingu i faktoringu w Europie. Eurofactor działa na polskim rynku od 2011 roku. Początkow...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:24
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Mumbai, 400013, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tatacapital.com
802/1000Good

Tata Capital Limited is a subsidiary of Tata Sons Limited. The Company is registered with the Reserve Bank of India as a Core Investment Company and offers through itself and its subsidiaries fund and fee-based financial services to its customers, under the Tata Capital...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:24,293
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eurofactor Polska S.A.

Eurofactor Polska S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eurofactor Polska S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Capital in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eurofactor Polska S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eurofactor Polska S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eurofactor Polska S.A.

Eurofactor Polska S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. company and Tata Capital company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. and Tata Capital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. and Tata Capital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eurofactor Polska S.A. or Tata Capital ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eurofactor Polska S.A. or Tata Capital ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. and Tata Capital, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eurofactor Polska S.A. and Tata Capital, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1