Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Eurocar FirenzeEurocar Firenze
VS
no oneno one
Eurocar Firenze

Eurocar Firenze

Via Pratese, 135, Firenze, 50145, IT

Last Update: 03/01/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Eurocar Firenze - Volkswagen Group Firenze è un’azienda che riunisce varie realtà sul territorio fiorentino: Volkswagen, Audi, SEAT, Skoda, Veicoli Commerciali ed il Centro Usato Aziendale Eurocar Firenze. Da Gennaio 2017 è passata sotto la proprietà di Porsche Holdin...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:61
Subsidiaries:110
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
no one

no one

RU

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
http://www.noone.ru
857/1000Very Good

Компания NO ONE более 20 лет занимает лидирующие позиции в розничном сегменте. NO ONE – один из крупнейших дистрибьюторов обуви и аксессуаров ведущих европейских брендов на российском рынке. В портфеле компании NO ONE около 50 европейских марок: Casadei, Fabi, Vici...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,007
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eurocar Firenze

Eurocar Firenze

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
no one

no one

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eurocar Firenze in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for no one in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eurocar Firenze (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eurocar Firenze cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - no one (X = Date, Y = Severity)

no one cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eurocar Firenze

Eurocar Firenze

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
no one

no one

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eurocar Firenze company and no one company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eurocar Firenze and no one, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eurocar Firenze and no one, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eurocar Firenze or no one ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eurocar Firenze or no one ?
Between Eurocar Firenze and no one, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eurocar Firenze and no one, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3