Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Etisalat AfghanistanEtisalat Afghanistan
VS
EEEE
Etisalat Afghanistan

Etisalat Afghanistan

Charahi Shahid, Ehsan Plaza, Kabul, undefined, 25000, AF

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.etisalat.af/en/
758/1000Fair

Etisalat Afghanistan is 100% owned subsidiary of Etisalat UAE. Etisalat is one of the largest telecommunications companies in the world and the leading operator in the Middle East and Africa, headquartered in the UAE. Etisalat operates in 18 countries across Asia, the M...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,117
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EE

EE

London , GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ee.co.uk
766/1000Fair

EE, part of BT Group, is the largest and most advanced mobile communications company in the UK, delivering mobile and fixed communications services to consumers. We run the UK's biggest and fastest mobile network, having pioneered the UK's first superfast 4G mobile se...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:12,014
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Etisalat Afghanistan

Etisalat Afghanistan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EE

EE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Etisalat Afghanistan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EE in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Etisalat Afghanistan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Etisalat Afghanistan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Etisalat Afghanistan

Etisalat Afghanistan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EE

EE

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
EE410251223

FAQ

Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan company and EE company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan and EE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan and EE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Etisalat Afghanistan or EE ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Etisalat Afghanistan or EE ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan and EE, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Etisalat Afghanistan and EE, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1